Skip to main content
Glama
musnows

RAG MCP Tool

by musnows
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to RAG MCP Tool

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • context-bridge

      elkraps
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides LLMs with secure, read-only access to local documentation by scanning directories, extracting content from PDF, DOCX, Markdown, and text files, and performing keyword searches.
      3
      9 npm
      MIT

    • embgrep

      QuartzUnit
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides local semantic search over files using embeddings, enabling directory indexing and natural language queries without external services.
      MIT

    • rag_mcp

      mmer547
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables retrieval-augmented generation by allowing LLMs to search documents in a local folder using vector similarity, supporting multiple file formats.
      -

    • mcp-doc-search

      anujmv
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving documents from a local folder to ground LLM answers in your files.
      2
      MIT

    • localgate

      omgamy1179-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local AI agents to perform hybrid search (BM25 + vector) over privately indexed local files, including notes, PDFs, DOCX, source code, and OCR'd images. All indexing and retrieval stay on the machine with read-only, whitelist-scoped access.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one reads raw file content, while the other searches a RAG database. There is no overlap in functionality or ambiguity about when to use each tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use snake_case naming, which is consistent. However, the verb patterns differ slightly: 'read' vs. 'search', which is acceptable but not perfectly uniform. The naming is clear and follows a logical convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels severely under-scoped for a RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system. A typical RAG server would include tools for indexing, updating, deleting, or managing the database, not just reading files and searching. This minimal set limits functionality significantly.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is highly incomplete for a RAG domain. There are no tools for indexing documents, updating the database, deleting entries, or managing the RAG system's lifecycle. This forces agents into dead ends for basic operations like adding new data or maintaining the database.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources