get_agent_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It merely states 'Return' implying a read operation but does not mention idempotency, side effects, authentication needs, or whether the instructions are static or dynamically generated. This is insufficient for safe agent usage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence of 14 words is very concise and front-loaded. However, it could be slightly expanded to cover parameter details without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description does not explain what the tool returns (e.g., format, structure of instructions), default behavior when optional parameters are omitted, or any error conditions. Incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must explain parameters. It references 'local platform and write mode' loosely aligning with the two parameters, but does not clarify that 'writer' corresponds to 'write mode' or explain the meaning of each enum value. The description adds minimal value beyond the enum names in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description specifies verb 'Return' and resource 'host desktop agent workflow instructions', indicating the tool retrieves instructions filtered by platform and mode. It distinguishes from sibling 'build_*' tools which generate rather than retrieve. However, 'workflow instructions' is somewhat vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like the many 'build_*' siblings. The purpose is implied but not contrasted with other tools. No prerequisites or when-not-to-use conditions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.