Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to jobd

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for monitoring and managing multi-cluster Slurm GPU jobs, enabling AI agents to execute commands, check allocations, and explore logs across HPC clusters.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Jungle Grid MCP Server lets AI agents submit, estimate, monitor, and retrieve logs for GPU workloads through Jungle Grid. It enables agentic execution for inference, training, fine-tuning, and batch jobs without manually choosing GPU providers or infrastructure.
      8
      9 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      agent-mq is a message queue that enables AI coding agents to communicate with each other across sessions and machines. Agents can send messages, delegate tasks, and coordinate work — all through MCP tools. Supports Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenClaw, and any MCP-compatible tool. UUID-based authentication with per-user data isolation. Self-hostable with Docker.
      7
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for renting real GPUs from the terminal. Enables browsing, renting, chatting, managing, and pooling GPU instances with per-second billing, designed for AI agents.
      76 npm
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a persistent compute queue for AI agents, enabling them to submit hardware-aware GPU jobs, monitor execution, and retrieve results and artifacts across sessions via MCP tools.
      13
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: status/logs/cancel/preempt/list/events/workers/worker_delete/submit. There is no overlap between them; even status vs events are clearly differentiated (state snapshot vs why-events).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent jobd_<verb> or jobd_<noun>_<verb> pattern (jobd_status, jobd_logs, jobd_cancel, jobd_preempt, jobd_list, jobd_events, jobd_workers, jobd_worker_delete, jobd_submit). The pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    9 tools is well-scoped for a job scheduling/broker domain: submit, inspect (status/logs/list/events), control (cancel/preempt), and fleet management (workers/worker_delete). Each tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full job lifecycle: submit, status, logs, cancel, preempt, list, events, and worker management. Minor gaps like resubmit or job deletion are absent, but the core scheduling workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week