Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Computer Use

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives any AI assistant eyes and hands on your desktop — screenshots, clicking, typing, OCR, window management, accessibility-tree queries, workflow recording.
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An open-source MCP server for macOS and Windows that provides native desktop control via Accessibility APIs, OCR, and Chrome CDP. It enables AI agents to interact with applications, manage browser sessions, and automate workflows with high-speed native UI actions.
      111 npm
      15
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      macOS MCP server that enables AI agents to directly control the host OS, including mouse, keyboard, windows, files, and accessibility automation for computer-use workflows.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents real OS-level control of macOS, enabling them to click real buttons, type real keys, and observe rendered screens just like a human would.
      128 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local, dependency-free MCP server that gives AI agents controlled access to the active Windows desktop, enabling automated interaction with applications through screenshots, clicks, typing, and window management.
      85 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Cross-platform desktop automation MCP server that lets AI agents capture screenshots, run OCR with UI-element classification, control mouse/keyboard, and launch programs on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
      20
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct and descriptions explicitly separate native-app actions from browser actions, with cross-references like click vs browser_click and type_text vs browser_type. Some overlap remains among tab lifecycle and input tools, but an agent can generally tell them apart.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names use consistent snake_case and a clear browser_ prefix for browser-specific tools. Minor deviations like screenshot, zoom, wait, and clipboard_read/clipboard_write are still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 32 tools, the set is heavy for a single server, exceeding the 25+ threshold in the rubric. While computer use is broad, several browser tab and input tools could be consolidated without losing core capability.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong across native app control, browser automation, tabs, clipboard, displays, and credential handling. Minor gaps include window management, browser drag/hover/select-text, double-click, and file upload/download workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues