Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to jira-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Jira Data Center / Server (self-hosted Jira, REST API v2) that exposes core work-item project-management operations (platform + Agile) as MCP tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage self-hosted Atlassian Jira Server/Data Center issues and Bitbucket Server/Data Center repositories, pull requests, branches, commits, and files through MCP tools.
      9 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Zero-dependency MCP server for self-hosted Jira Server/Data Center that supports Basic Auth and PAT, enabling JQL search, issue creation/update, comments, transitions, and assignment on Jira 8.x including pre-8.14.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for interacting with self-hosted Jira instances using Personal Access Token (PAT) authentication. It enables users to perform CRUD operations on issues, search with JQL, manage comments, and list projects through the Jira REST API.
      12
      439 npm
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server for self-hosted Jira Server, exposing REST API v2 tools for search, issue creation/update, transitions, comments, and more to AI clients via MCP protocol.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Jira Cloud MCP server providing Jira-first tools for common workflows and full REST API coverage through a generic request tool.
      449 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 97 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action, but the attachment trio is duplicated across domains (jira_list_attachments/jira_upload_attachment/jira_delete_attachment vs list_attachments/upload_attachment/delete_attachment), and create_test_case vs create_test_cases_bulk, create_test_result vs create_test_results_bulk, and the run-result readers (get_test_run_results/get_test_run_summary/get_latest_result_for_test_case) overlap in scope. The extremely detailed, quirk-filled descriptions help an agent choose, but the near-duplicate names still risk misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    snake_case is used throughout, but the surface splits into a jira_-prefixed Jira family and an unprefixed Zephyr family, so the same conceptual operation (list_attachments, delete_attachment) appears under two conventions. Within families the verb_noun pattern is mostly consistent, with oddities like jira_list_sprints vs jira_get_sprint and noun-first names such as health_check and find_jira_user.

    Tool Count1/5

    97 tools is an extreme mismatch for a single server, spanning two large products (Jira core plus Zephyr Scale). The set is far past the 50+ threshold where findability collapses, and many capabilities (bulk vs single, run-result readers, raw jira_request) push the count higher without adding distinct value.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage is exceptional: full CRUD for test cases, runs, plans, folders, results, environments and attachments; test-case scripting (steps, script replacement, clone, bulk, move); traceability/coverage reporting; automation-result ingestion; and Jira issue/comment/worklog/watcher/link/board/sprint operations. Documented gaps (run mutability requiring recreation or internal API) are explicit escape hatches rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues