A
licenseA
qualityF
maintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes via URIs and tools.
12
5 npm
8
MIT
gmail-mcp MCP Server
by mundume
Related Servers
Alternatives to gmail-mcp MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, providing resources for accessing notes via URIs, tools for creating notes, and prompts for generating summaries.715 npm-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple note-taking system using low-level server components and streamable HTTP. It enables users to create, store, and summarize text notes through a set of tools, resources, and specialized prompts.3-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system with resources, tools for creating notes, and prompts for summarization.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server implementing a simple notes system with resources, tools for creating notes, and prompts for summarization.-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes.23-
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: getEmailContent retrieves a specific email's full content, listEmails lists emails with optional filtering/summarization, and sendEmail sends emails. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (getEmailContent, listEmails, sendEmail) with clear, descriptive names. The naming style is uniform throughout the set, enhancing readability and predictability.
Tool Count3/5
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a Gmail integration, as it lacks operations like deleting emails, marking as read/unread, or managing labels. While the core functions are present, the scope is limited compared to typical email management needs.
Completeness3/5
The tools cover basic read (get, list) and write (send) operations, but there are notable gaps in the email lifecycle, such as updating email status (e.g., delete, archive, mark as read) or handling attachments. This could lead to agent workarounds for common email tasks.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues