Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-shield

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that audits other MCP servers. Run MCPWatch security scans from inside Claude Code or any MCP-compatible agent with 10 OWASP MCP Top 10 aligned checks and A-F letter grades.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Diagnose MCP servers — health checks, tool testing, token cost audits, conflict detection, and security scanning with 50+ prompt injection patterns. Works as CLI or MCP server inside Claude Desktop.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server that lets Claude, ChatGPT and other AI assistants operate a Linux server safely: read-only by default, every change previewed and confirmed, secrets masked, full local audit log.
      18
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets agents scan a project's AI agent setup — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, MCP servers and instruction files — and surface security findings such as the lethal trifecta, broad permissions, exposed secrets and unpinned packages.
      57 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: audit_supply_chain focuses on npm package health metrics, check_prompt_injection analyzes text for injection attacks, scan_directory examines local MCP server files, and scan_package downloads and analyzes npm packages. The four tools cover different security aspects without ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: audit_supply_chain, check_prompt_injection, scan_directory, and scan_package. The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, this server is well-scoped for its security-focused purpose. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct security domains (supply chain auditing, prompt injection detection, local scanning, and package scanning), avoiding bloat while providing comprehensive coverage.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for MCP server security assessment: it handles both local and remote sources (directories and npm packages), includes both static analysis (scanning) and dynamic checks (prompt injection), and covers supply chain risks. No obvious gaps exist for this domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessOutdated data