Skip to main content
Glama
muhammadyusuf-kurbonov

utel-mcp

by muhammadyusuf-kurbonov
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to utel-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP API Server

      fikri2992
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to make HTTP requests (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) to external APIs through standardized MCP tools.
      4
      2
      MIT
    • VoIPbin MCP Server by voipbin

      VoIPbin MCP Serverofficial

      voipbin
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with the VoIPbin CPaaS platform, exposing tools for managing calls, flows, messaging, conferencing, and more.
      52
      1
      MIT
    • Bandwidth MCP Server by Bandwidth

      Bandwidth MCP Serverofficial

      Bandwidth
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Official MCP server for interacting with Bandwidth APIs (messaging, voice, number lookup, etc.) via AI agents. Supports configurable tool filtering and multiple deployment modes.
      2
      -

    • OpenAPI MCP Server

      luciVuc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A generic MCP server that dynamically converts OpenAPI-defined REST APIs into tools for LLMs like Claude. It supports multiple authentication methods and transport protocols, enabling seamless interaction with any OpenAPI-compliant API.
      8 npm
      MIT

    • MCP API Requester

      yryuu
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to make arbitrary HTTP requests (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.) with custom headers, bodies, and cookies, supporting JSON and error handling.
      1
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no potential for confusion between tools. The single tool has a distinct purpose: sending requests to the UTEL API.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Only one tool exists, so naming consistency is not an issue. The name 'send_request' follows a verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count1/5

    A single generic tool for an entire API surface is an extreme mismatch. The tool count is far too low for any non-trivial domain; it forces the agent to manage all API logic internally.

    Completeness1/5

    The single tool provides no specialized operations (e.g., CRUD, search), leaving agents to manually construct requests for every action. This is severely incomplete for a typical API interface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources