mcp-server-template
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-template
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA production-ready foundation for building secure, observable MCP servers with built-in authentication, rate limiting, and reference tools like database-query and semantic-search.1511 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides a production-oriented MCP server exposing tools, resources, and prompts over Streamable HTTP with JWT authentication and per-tool RBAC, enabling Amazon Bedrock Claude clients to securely invoke MCP capabilities.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA production-ready, security-first starting point for building Model Context Protocol servers, enforcing safe defaults like dry-run and tenant isolation.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn enterprise MCP server scaffold that provides secure, governed access to internal tools through RBAC, audit logging, rate limiting, and prompt-injection boundaries, with a FastAPI control plane and OpenTelemetry observability.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server designed for multi-tenant, authenticated, and observable AI agent systems, enabling secure tool execution across heterogeneous data sources.64MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables developers to build and deploy secure, typed Model Context Protocol servers with tools, resources, prompts, bearer-token authentication, per-tool scopes, rate limiting, and health probes over Streamable HTTP.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool addresses a separate concern: one computes string lengths, one looks up records, and one simulates a timeout. There is no overlap or realistic chance of choosing the wrong tool.
Two tools follow a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern (summarise_lengths, fetch_record), but slow_operation reads as adjective_noun. The naming is still readable and predictable overall.
Three tools is a reasonable size for a template server. Each tool exists to demonstrate a distinct capability, so none feel redundant or excessive.
As a template, the set covers the demonstrated scenarios: a utility operation, a record lookup with a defined absent-case, and a timeout example. There are no obvious dead ends or missing pieces for that purpose.