Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to markpin-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only, filesystem-based access to Obsidian vault Markdown notes, including full-text search, title/path search, and frontmatter or tag metadata lookup, all without running Obsidian or using a plugin/REST API.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local hybrid search over Obsidian and Markdown vaults via MCP, combining vector retrieval, full-text search, reranking, graph navigation, and safe CRUD while keeping data local.
      43
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search, read, list, and append to markdown notes in a local Obsidian vault or folder of .md files.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables saving, searching, retrieving, linking and importing AI work as plain markdown files with automatic provenance in a local folder the user owns. Runs entirely on the user's machine with no account, key or network calls, and never deletes anything.
      11
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct retrieval axis: recency (list_recent), relevance/full-text (search), single-page detail (get_page), and tag aggregation (list_tags). The one fuzzy boundary is that search with an empty query duplicates list_recent's behavior, but the descriptions call this out explicitly enough that an agent can still choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three of four tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_recent, get_page, list_tags); `search` is a bare verb, a minor deviation from the pattern but unambiguous. No style mixing (camelCase vs snake_case) or chaotic variants.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is slim but proportionate for what appears to be a read-only retrieval companion to a browser bookmarking extension. Each tool covers a genuinely different access path, so none feels redundant padding, though the surface is close to thin.

    Completeness3/5

    The read side is thorough — pages, tags, notes, clips, reading state, and two listing orders are all reachable. However, there is no write path at all: an agent cannot save a page, add a note or clip, tag anything, or set read/bookmark state, which are the core lifecycle actions the descriptions imply exist in the underlying product.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues