Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to RouteX402

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent trust verification, enabling agents to verify identities, check trust scores, and build reputation across multiple blockchain and web platforms.
      12
      15 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to verify each other's trust scores, register, submit reviews, and find trusted agents before transacting.
      4
      15 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that verifies storefront merchants before AI agents make payments, checking if the merchant is a real legal entity bound to the domain, and returning a PROCEED, ABORT, or REVIEW decision to prevent payment to clones or fraudulent stores.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for real-time Solana token risk analysis. Cross-references RugCheck.xyz, DexScreener, and GoPlus Security to generate three-layer reports: machine verdict → LLM analysis → raw on-chain evidence. Live on Solana mainnet with USDC micropayments ($0.02/audit). Give any AI agent the ability to check if a token is safe before trading.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one performs a targeted lookup for a specific agent, while the other returns a ranked discovery list. An agent can easily choose between checking a known seller and browsing top sellers.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: check_agent_reputation and list_top_agents. The verbs and object nouns are predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a reputation/discovery server, even if both are useful. It covers the two headline workflows but leaves little room for filtering, detail lookup, or supporting operations.

    Completeness3/5

    The core workflows of checking a known agent and listing top agents are covered, but the surface lacks search/filtering, detailed agent profiles or history, and any mechanism for submitting or updating reputation data. These are notable gaps for a reputation-oriented server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues