notebook_clear_cell_outputs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It accurately states the effect (clears outputs and execution count) but omits behavioral details such as whether the notebook file is automatically saved, whether this is reversible, or any permission requirements. The description is minimally transparent but not misleading.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that states exactly what the tool does. No wasted words, perfectly front-loaded. This is as concise as possible while remaining clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given two parameters, no output schema, and two dozen sibling tools, the description is minimally complete. It explains the core action but lacks context about the side effect of modifying the notebook file, the irreversible nature of the operation, or explicit differentiation from similar tools. Adequate but could do more.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides 100% coverage for both parameters (path, cell_index) with clear descriptions. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema offers, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action (clears outputs and execution count) on a specific resource (a specific cell). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'notebook_clear_all_outputs' and 'notebook_read_cell_output' by focusing on clearing a single cell's output state.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., notebook_clear_all_outputs for clearing all cells, or notebook_edit_cell_output for modifying but not clearing). No usage context or when-not-to-use information is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.