mcp-server-redcap
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-redcap
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables interaction with Redash instances through a standardized interface, allowing users to execute SQL queries, manage data sources, and retrieve query results using natural language.43,371 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLM-based agents to interact with FHIR healthcare data through natural language prompts, providing full CRUD operations on FHIR resources, document processing, and semantic search capabilities.13102MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Redash queries, dashboards, visualizations, and data sources via natural language.154 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLM-based agents to interact with FHIR-compliant backends through natural-language prompts, supporting CRUD operations on clinical resources, document ingestion, semantic search, and LOINC terminology lookup.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLM-based agents and MCP-compatible clients to query and manipulate clinical data on a FHIR-compliant backend through natural-language prompts, including CRUD operations, document ingestion, semantic search, and LOINC terminology lookup.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLM-based agents and MCP-compatible clients to query and manipulate FHIR-compliant clinical data through natural-language prompts, supporting CRUD operations, document ingestion, semantic search, LOINC lookup, and secure FHIR API integration.-
TDQS
Scored across 38 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with the export_* family differentiated by target (records, report, files, PDF, arms, events, surveys). A few pairs like get_project_info vs get_project_structure could initially confuse agents, but their descriptions separate metadata from structural overview.
All 38 tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using lowercase with underscores (e.g., delete_file, get_metadata, import_records). There are no mixed naming conventions or vague verbs, making the API highly predictable.
38 tools is a substantial surface, but it maps to the full breadth of REDCap functionality (records, files, metadata, instruments, arms, events, surveys, project structure). Each tool has a specific job, and the count feels justified for a comprehensive integration, though it borders on heavy.
The tool set covers the core REDCap workflows: record CRUD, file attachments, data dictionary editing, instrument/event management, longitudinal arms/events, and survey links. Obvious gaps include user/role management and project-level settings updates, but these are peripheral to most programmatic REDCap interactions.