Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to BlackBox-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for local-first project memory, enabling AI agents to log, search, and retrieve structured project history, summaries, and per-file dossiers with client-specific configuration and diagnostics.
      15
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that gives any AI coding agent per-project memory, workflow intelligence, and always-on, lossless token & context optimization.
      37
      12 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server for coordinating Codex and ZCode agents, enabling task management, event tracking, and optional cross-machine Redis relay.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that persists AI coding agent memory and session context, enabling seamless resume across sessions with searchable memories and checkpoints.
      7 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are generally distinct: assistant CRUD, task delegation, memory, provider management all have clear boundaries. Some potential overlap exists between task delegation modes (delegate_task vs parallel_task vs debate_task vs pipeline_task), but descriptions clarify their distinct purposes. The enable/disable_assistant pair could be confused with update_assistant(enabled=...), but not severely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Mostly consistent verb_noun pattern (list_assistants, create_assistant, delegate_task, save_memory). A few deviations exist: blackbox_status and blackbox_help use a prefix instead of verb_noun, and agent_handoff is a noun without a clear verb. However, the vast majority follow the expected convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    35 tools is on the heavy side for a single server, though the domain is broad (assistants, tasks, memory, providers, approvals, project scanning). Some functions could be merged (e.g., enable/disable_assistant could be handled by update_assistant), and the task delegation variants might be consolidated. It's borderline but not egregious.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage is comprehensive: full CRUD for assistants, providers, and memory; task lifecycle includes delegation, listing, retrieval, cancellation, and multiple modes (parallel, review, debate, pipeline); approvals and configuration are included. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose of coordinating AI assistants.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues