Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to rigor-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Eval-integrity statistics for AI benchmark claims — multiple-testing correction, power/MDE for model gaps, judge-bias and leaderboard-rank checks. Catches a benchmark number that won't survive a second look.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive statistical analysis including descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, regression, and more via a FastMCP-based API.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables statistical A/B testing by computing Welch's two-sample t-test, Satterthwaite degrees of freedom, and two-tailed p-values, alongside time-series forecasting, anomaly detection, regression, and PCA through MCP tools.
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables auditing scientific papers for methodological biases such as selection bias and p-hacking, and assessing citation credibility and research consensus.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Give AI agents 10 offline tools for market observations, repeated headlines, forecast evaluation, correlation risk and statistical checks. Preserve source clocks, missing data and stated assumptions. Python, CLI and MCP share the same zero-dependency core; no feed collection or trade execution.
      2
      10
      344 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform reproducible, verifiable statistical analysis through 25 deterministic tools for descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, regression, clustering, time-series forecasting, and Chinese-labeled plotting.
      30
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct statistical procedure or design (e.g., paired vs. independent proportions, fixed-sample vs. sequential means, chi-square vs. exact test), and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference sibling tools to prevent misselection. Even the paired power/sample-size tools are clearly differentiated as inverse operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case and follow a predictable pattern: tests are named after the procedure (e.g., two_sample_t_test, mann_whitney_u), effect sizes after the statistic, and power/sample-size tools share the power_for_/sample_size_for_ prefix. The few non-test utilities (recommend_test, naive_peeking_inflation) are still stylistically consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    37 tools is well beyond the 25+ threshold for a heavy surface, even though each tool is individually useful. The inclusion of recommend_test and pairwise_group_comparisons mitigates the burden, but the set would benefit from consolidation or a more focused scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The suite covers the common lifecycle of a statistical analysis: assumption checks, parametric/nonparametric tests, effect sizes, power/sample-size planning, multiple-comparison corrections, and pairwise follow-ups. Minor gaps remain, such as no power/sample-size calculations for ANOVA or chi-square and no explicit normality test, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues