Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to rigor-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to run verified statistical and analytics computations—including hypothesis tests, A/B testing, descriptive summaries, and sample-size planning—directly on local CSV, TSV, Excel, and Parquet files of any size. Results include effect sizes, confidence intervals, plain-English interpretations, and assumption warnings, with optional independent checks.
      23
      88 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and AI agents to compute sample sizes and statistical power for the G*Power t-test family through six tools — listing and describing tests, running power analyses, computing effect sizes, generating power curves, and reporting engine provenance — with every result returned as the engine's verbatim JSON.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Eval-integrity statistics for AI benchmark claims — multiple-testing correction, power/MDE for model gaps, judge-bias and leaderboard-rank checks. Catches a benchmark number that won't survive a second look.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive statistical analysis including descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, regression, and more via a FastMCP-based API.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables statistical A/B testing by computing Welch's two-sample t-test, Satterthwaite degrees of freedom, and two-tailed p-values, alongside time-series forecasting, anomaly detection, regression, and PCA through MCP tools.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables auditing scientific papers for methodological biases such as selection bias and p-hacking, and assessing citation credibility and research consensus.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct statistical procedure or design (e.g., paired vs. independent proportions, fixed-sample vs. sequential means, chi-square vs. exact test), and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference sibling tools to prevent misselection. Even the paired power/sample-size tools are clearly differentiated as inverse operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case and follow a predictable pattern: tests are named after the procedure (e.g., two_sample_t_test, mann_whitney_u), effect sizes after the statistic, and power/sample-size tools share the power_for_/sample_size_for_ prefix. The few non-test utilities (recommend_test, naive_peeking_inflation) are still stylistically consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    37 tools is well beyond the 25+ threshold for a heavy surface, even though each tool is individually useful. The inclusion of recommend_test and pairwise_group_comparisons mitigates the burden, but the set would benefit from consolidation or a more focused scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The suite covers the common lifecycle of a statistical analysis: assumption checks, parametric/nonparametric tests, effect sizes, power/sample-size planning, multiple-comparison corrections, and pairwise follow-ups. Minor gaps remain, such as no power/sample-size calculations for ANOVA or chi-square and no explicit normality test, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues