semrush_site_audit_page_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and idempotentHint=true. The description adds little beyond stating it retrieves data, which is consistent. No contradictions, but no additional behavioral context like rate limits or authentication requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the core action. It wastes no words, though it could benefit from a slightly more structured format (e.g., listing key capabilities).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity (2 params, no output schema), the description is too minimal. It does not specify what the returned data includes, leaving the agent without understanding the output format or contents. A brief list of examples would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain the meaning of 'project_id' or 'page_id', leaving the agent to infer from context. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to compensate, providing no clarity on what these parameters represent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves 'detailed audit data for a specific page,' using a specific verb and resource. It effectively distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'semrush_site_audit_pages' (list pages) and 'semrush_site_audit_issues' (get issues).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to use 'semrush_site_audit_pages' or 'semrush_site_audit_snapshot_detail'. There is no mention of prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.