Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ya-metrics-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Yandex Metrica analytics: query web analytics metrics, goals, conversions, and raw API data using natural language from AI clients like Claude and Cursor.
      8
      67 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Yandex Direct, Metrika, Search API, Wordstat and Webmaster. Connect an AI assistant to advertising, website analytics, search results and search-demand data.
      48
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides access to Yandex Metrika analytics data through various tools and functions. This server allows AI assistants and applications to retrieve comprehensive analytics data from Yandex Metrika accounts.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Yandex Metrika API, enabling reporting, counter management, goals, filters, and other operations via natural language.
      12
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that connects Yandex Direct advertising reports and safe campaign creation to AI agents, enabling natural-language analytics and protected campaign setup.
      8
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Yandex AppMetrica analytics, enabling Claude to access reports, raw event logs, crash data, and push notification campaigns.
      11
      7 npm
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but some overlap exists (e.g., get_browsers_report vs get_device_analysis both deal with browser information). Descriptions generally help differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is mixed: most tools use get_<noun>, but there are list_ and compare_ prefixes, and anomalies like sources_search_phrases. The pattern is inconsistent but still readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 31 tools, the surface is too large for a focused analytics server. Many tools are granular, increasing risk of agent misselection and making the tool set feel bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Core analytics areas are well-covered: traffic sources, content, e-commerce, goals, devices, geography. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no funnel or path analysis), but the set is largely complete for standard reporting.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues