Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
ableton-mcp

ableton-mcp

by mrinalghosh
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

explain_shortcut

Look up the keyboard shortcut for any Ableton Live action by providing the action name.

Instructions

Look up an Ableton Live keyboard shortcut by action name.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "action": "<action>"
    },
    "name": "explain_shortcut"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.0.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only says 'look up', which implies read-only, but does not disclose behavior on missing action, side effects, or permissions. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, directly states purpose, no wasted words. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Low complexity (1 param, no output schema). But description omits what the tool returns (e.g., key combination, description). Incomplete for a lookup tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% coverage. Description adds meaning by stating the parameter is an 'action name', but no format, examples, or constraints are given. Partial compensation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'look up' and resource 'keyboard shortcut', and input 'action name'. Clearly distinguishes from sibling tools which are creation/manipulation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for looking up shortcuts by action name, but no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternatives. Context is clear but no guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools