Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Test MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This repository provides a template for creating MCP servers with Python, including installation instructions and tools for testing with the MCP Inspector.
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A basic MCP server template built with FastMCP framework that provides example tools for echoing messages and retrieving server information. Serves as a starting point for building custom MCP servers with support for both stdio and HTTP transports.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A boilerplate MCP server built with Python and FastMCP, ready for deployment on Render, with example tools and logging.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-ready template for developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using Python and FastMCP.
      Apache 2.0
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A basic MCP server template built with FastMCP framework that provides example tools for echoing messages and retrieving server information. Serves as a starting point for building custom MCP servers with both stdio and HTTP transport support.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose (cat facts, weather, email, jokes, etc.), so there is minimal overlap. However, the wide variety of domains could confuse an agent about when to use which.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Tool names are inconsistent: some use verb_noun (get_weather, list_emails), others use verb_phrase (tell_joke, find_inspiration), and one is noun_noun (cat_fact). No consistent pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    The count of 9 tools is reasonable, but the server lacks a coherent domain; it feels like a random collection. For a single-purpose server it might be too many, but the number itself is not excessive.

    Completeness2/5

    No clear domain, so completeness is poor. Email tools have list, get, reply but no send or delete; weather is just a single lookup; other domains are single-tool only, leaving many gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues