Skip to main content
Glama
mrexodia

IDA Pro MCP

by mrexodia
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to IDA Pro MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • PCM

      rand-tech
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for reverse engineering that enables interaction with IDA Pro for analysis tasks such as decompilation, disassembly, and memory engagement reports.
      24
      46
      MIT

    • ida-domain-mcp

      xxyyue
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Headless MCP server for IDA Pro enabling on-demand database loading and programmatic reverse engineering workflows via MCP tools.
      18
      MIT

    • idamesh

      JordanRO2
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes IDA Pro's disassembler and Hex-Rays decompiler as tools and resources, enabling parallel binary analysis with multiple agents through a supervisor.
      1
      MIT

    • IDA-MCP

      ahmad009
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that runs inside IDA Pro for AI tools, exposing reverse-engineering capabilities like function listing, decompilation, and analysis via HTTP.
      MIT

    • idalib-mcp-headless

      nyaoouo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A headless MCP server that manages multiple independent IDA Pro worker processes for reverse engineering, supporting database operations and debug tools.
      19
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 43 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set has clear functional groupings, but there is significant overlap between data reading tools (data_read_byte, data_read_word, etc.) and memory/global variable tools, with explicit guidance to prefer certain tools over others indicating ambiguity. Tools like list_functions and get_function_by_address serve distinct but related purposes that could cause confusion in selection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun or verb_noun_preposition pattern (e.g., get_function_by_address, set_global_variable_type), with clear action-object naming. Minor deviations exist, such as convert_number (verb_noun) vs. declare_c_type (verb_noun), but overall the naming is predictable and readable across the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 43 tools, the count is excessive for typical MCP server purposes, leading to potential cognitive overload and reduced usability. While IDA Pro is a complex domain, the tool surface could be consolidated (e.g., merging data_read_* variants) to improve coherence without losing functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set comprehensively covers IDA Pro's core functionalities, including disassembly, decompilation, data reading, variable and type management, cross-referencing, and metadata retrieval. It supports full CRUD/lifecycle operations for functions, variables, and types, with no obvious gaps for agent-driven analysis workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources