Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Atlas

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to create and manage persistent SQLite databases through natural language without requiring SQL knowledge. It allows users to propose schemas, store records, and perform complex queries across multiple databases for structured data tracking.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An extensible MCP server for database operations that supports PostgreSQL for managing schemas, tables, data, and user permissions. It features automatic migration recording for DDL changes and integrates with various AI-powered editors like Cursor, Zed, and Claude Code.
      9 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables database migration between heterogeneous systems (Oracle, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Netezza to PostgreSQL or SQL Server) through AI assistants by providing tools for command preview, execution, validation, and workflow suggestions.
      6
      13 PyPI
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that allows AI assistants to query databases using natural language by leveraging Vanna AI. It supports secure SSH tunneling, model training on database schemas, and persistent storage of SQL patterns via ChromaDB.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to query databases, execute SQL, and manage Metabase resources like dashboards, cards, and collections through natural language.
      22
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose within the migration workflow: apply, diff, lint, new, status, and validate. The descriptions specify unique actions (e.g., applying migrations vs. generating diffs vs. detecting issues), leaving no ambiguity about which tool to use for a given task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'migrate-verb' pattern with hyphenated naming (e.g., migrate-apply, migrate-diff). This predictable structure makes it easy to understand each tool's function and ensures uniformity across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for database migration management. Each tool serves a specific, non-redundant role in the migration lifecycle, from creation to validation and application, making the count appropriate and efficient for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset provides complete coverage of the migration domain, including creation (migrate-new), analysis (migrate-diff, migrate-lint, migrate-validate), status tracking (migrate-status), and execution (migrate-apply). There are no obvious gaps, enabling agents to handle the full migration workflow without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues