outlook-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to outlook-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for sending and managing Microsoft Outlook email via the Microsoft Graph API, including drafts, replies, contacts, and directory search.173 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for local Microsoft Outlook automation, providing 64 tools across email, calendar, contacts, tasks, notes, and Exchange features on both Windows and macOS.28 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing full control over Outlook.com, Hotmail, Live, or Microsoft 365 email via Microsoft Graph API, enabling reading, searching, sending, and managing messages and folders securely.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Microsoft Outlook that enables searching, sending, and managing mail and calendar via the OWA REST API using browser-session authentication, with no Azure AD app registration required.173 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenance22 consolidated MCP tools for email, calendar, contacts, folders, rules, categories, and settings with safety controls (dry-run preview, rate limiting, recipient allowlists) and MCP annotations on every tool. Works with personal Outlook.com and work/school Microsoft 365 accounts.22504 npm39MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides 49 tools to access Microsoft Outlook for Mac, enabling management of mail, calendar, contacts, tasks, and notes via AppleScript.4910MIT
TDQS
Scored across 71 tools
Descriptions actively differentiate near-pairs (list_inbox vs search_mail, list vs *_delta, reclassify_message vs set_inbox_override, reply vs rsvp, move vs copy vs delete, read_message vs read_messages), which is unusually good given the surface size. Remaining confusion risk comes from the volume of similarly shaped attachment/draft/event tools and the singular/plural read pair, but boundaries are stated explicitly.
Every tool uses the same outlook_ prefix and snake_case verb_noun form (list_, get_, create_, update_, delete_, send_, remove_). Resource qualifiers (task_attachment, event_attachment, draft) consistently keep parallel tools distinguishable without breaking the pattern.
At 71 tools the surface is far beyond a tractable set for an agent to select from reliably, even though the underlying domain (mail, calendar, contacts, To Do, attachments) is genuinely broad. Many capabilities (drafts, folders, overrides, checklist items, attachments across four resource types, three delta tools plus a combined digest) are niche enough that they inflate the menu rather than each earning a slot.
Lifecycle coverage is thorough: full CRUD on messages, drafts, folders, events, contacts, tasks and attachments, plus send/reply/forward, RSVP, categorization, flagging, focused-inbox overrides, bulk read/triage, and delta/polling sync. No obvious dead ends for the stated mail/calendar/contacts/tasks purpose.