Skip to main content
Glama
mp-juns

universal-research-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to universal-research-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows for AI agents to conduct rigorous decision-making.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A source-grounded cybersecurity knowledge & research MCP server that provides read-only search, exact citations, and a knowledge graph, designed to run alongside execution MCPs.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables proof-carrying project execution through a read-only remote MCP endpoint and WebMCP tools for managing Project Passports, task graphs, evidence-backed provider comparisons, route approvals, artifacts, verification records, and checkpoints without executing external providers.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables provenance-first scholarly retrieval, paper ingestion, and reproducible research workflows by searching academic and developer sources, extracting source-located facts and claims, and preserving evidence and provider uncertainty for MCP clients.
      37
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables researching, verifying, comparing, and composing open-source AI projects with transparent evidence and uncertainty boundaries through read-only tools.
      9
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides evidence-oriented MCP service for cryptographically identified agents, bounded public contracts, privacy-preserving records, and append-only audit.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 30 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The high-level domains are clear, but the governance cluster is overcrowded with near-synonymous non-executing operations such as evaluate_gate, evaluate_operation, validate_decision, capture_codex_decision, prepare_codex_dispatch, and codex_prepare_agent_control. An agent could easily select the wrong governance tool because the boundaries between 'evaluate', 'validate', 'capture', and 'prepare' are subtle and heavily overlapping.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent domain_verb_noun snake_case pattern, e.g., governance_validate_task_packet, research_prepare_ingest, memory_fetch_evidence, and codex_host_agent_status. Minor deviations like memory_latest, research_semantic_models, and public_demo_status break the verb-first pattern, but the overall style remains predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    Thirty tools is too many for a research MCP, especially when fifteen of them are governance variants that mostly 'prepare', 'validate', or 'evaluate' without executing. The tool surface feels bloated and micro-specialized rather than well-scoped, and several governance tools could likely be consolidated.

    Completeness3/5

    The core immutable ingest and evidence lifecycle is covered: prepare_ingest, commit_ingest, pending status, memory search, evidence fetching, eligibility checks, and ledger audit. However, there are notable gaps such as no way to list or cancel pending drafts, no general research query beyond memory candidates, and no direct approval path, though the host-owned design explains some of these omissions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues