universal-research-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to universal-research-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows for AI agents to conduct rigorous decision-making.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA source-grounded cybersecurity knowledge & research MCP server that provides read-only search, exact citations, and a knowledge graph, designed to run alongside execution MCPs.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables proof-carrying project execution through a read-only remote MCP endpoint and WebMCP tools for managing Project Passports, task graphs, evidence-backed provider comparisons, route approvals, artifacts, verification records, and checkpoints without executing external providers.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables provenance-first scholarly retrieval, paper ingestion, and reproducible research workflows by searching academic and developer sources, extracting source-located facts and claims, and preserving evidence and provider uncertainty for MCP clients.371Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables researching, verifying, comparing, and composing open-source AI projects with transparent evidence and uncertainty boundaries through read-only tools.92Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides evidence-oriented MCP service for cryptographically identified agents, bounded public contracts, privacy-preserving records, and append-only audit.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
The high-level domains are clear, but the governance cluster is overcrowded with near-synonymous non-executing operations such as evaluate_gate, evaluate_operation, validate_decision, capture_codex_decision, prepare_codex_dispatch, and codex_prepare_agent_control. An agent could easily select the wrong governance tool because the boundaries between 'evaluate', 'validate', 'capture', and 'prepare' are subtle and heavily overlapping.
Most tools follow a consistent domain_verb_noun snake_case pattern, e.g., governance_validate_task_packet, research_prepare_ingest, memory_fetch_evidence, and codex_host_agent_status. Minor deviations like memory_latest, research_semantic_models, and public_demo_status break the verb-first pattern, but the overall style remains predictable.
Thirty tools is too many for a research MCP, especially when fifteen of them are governance variants that mostly 'prepare', 'validate', or 'evaluate' without executing. The tool surface feels bloated and micro-specialized rather than well-scoped, and several governance tools could likely be consolidated.
The core immutable ingest and evidence lifecycle is covered: prepare_ingest, commit_ingest, pending status, memory search, evidence fetching, eligibility checks, and ledger audit. However, there are notable gaps such as no way to list or cancel pending drafts, no general research query beyond memory candidates, and no direct approval path, though the host-owned design explains some of these omissions.