Fagan
Related Servers
Alternatives to Fagan
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that splits coding work between ChatGPT web (planning, review) and Codex CLI (implementation), enabling agentic workflows over a local repo with risk-gated execution and safety rails.23MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server and HTTP gateway that dispatches coding tasks to Claude Code, Codex, and Antigravity CLI sessions, keeps track of those sessions, and optionally runs an implement → review → verify loop against a real repository.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets ChatGPT or any MCP client securely delegate coding tasks to a local Claude Code instance, with git checkpointing, approval gates, and structured results. Supports code review, test running, and rollback via simple tool calls.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that spawns autonomous Claude Code agents in GitHub repos, enabling task delegation with persistent state, multi-step workflows, and job monitoring.47187 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceOne MCP that turns Claude Code into your whole dev stack by swallowing other MCP servers, delegating to Codex & Gemini on your CLI subscriptions, remembering projects in a searchable knowledge graph, and carrying setup across sessions — secret-free by design.233MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMulti-agent orchestration MCP server that lets Claude Code delegate backend, frontend, and tooling tasks to specialized AI agents (Codex, Kimi, Grok) with contract-first sequencing and workspace mutation guards.47MIT
TDQS
Scored across 23 tools
The tool set is mostly well-separated, but there are overlapping clusters: set_story_status overlaps with both mark_story_done and mark_story_in_progress, and get_role_config is largely a subset of get_effective_config. Descriptions help disambiguate, but an agent could reasonably select the wrong tool in these cases.
Nearly all tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (dispatch_story, pause_plan, list_decisions). The only notable deviation is the single-word 'checkpoint', which is still understandable but breaks the otherwise consistent convention.
23 tools is on the heavier side, but the server covers a complex orchestration pipeline: plan management, story dispatch, status transitions, review/merge, decisions, and configuration inspection. Each major workflow area needs multiple tools, so the count feels justified rather than bloated.
The pipeline lifecycle is well covered: plan creation/ingestion, story dispatch/checkpoint/interrupt, status transitions, review, merge, decisions, and config diagnostics. Minor gaps exist, such as no plan deletion/update tool, no detailed plan/story read-back tool beyond list_plans and list_ready_stories, and no merge rejection or PR close path, but agents can work around these.