Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fagan

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server and HTTP gateway that dispatches coding tasks to Claude Code, Codex, and Antigravity CLI sessions, keeps track of those sessions, and optionally runs an implement → review → verify loop against a real repository.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets ChatGPT or any MCP client securely delegate coding tasks to a local Claude Code instance, with git checkpointing, approval gates, and structured results. Supports code review, test running, and rollback via simple tool calls.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that spawns autonomous Claude Code agents in GitHub repos, enabling task delegation with persistent state, multi-step workflows, and job monitoring.
      47
      187 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      One MCP that turns Claude Code into your whole dev stack by swallowing other MCP servers, delegating to Codex & Gemini on your CLI subscriptions, remembering projects in a searchable knowledge graph, and carrying setup across sessions — secret-free by design.
      23
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Multi-agent orchestration MCP server that lets Claude Code delegate backend, frontend, and tooling tasks to specialized AI agents (Codex, Kimi, Grok) with contract-first sequencing and workspace mutation guards.
      4
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set is mostly well-separated, but there are overlapping clusters: set_story_status overlaps with both mark_story_done and mark_story_in_progress, and get_role_config is largely a subset of get_effective_config. Descriptions help disambiguate, but an agent could reasonably select the wrong tool in these cases.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (dispatch_story, pause_plan, list_decisions). The only notable deviation is the single-word 'checkpoint', which is still understandable but breaks the otherwise consistent convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools is on the heavier side, but the server covers a complex orchestration pipeline: plan management, story dispatch, status transitions, review/merge, decisions, and configuration inspection. Each major workflow area needs multiple tools, so the count feels justified rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The pipeline lifecycle is well covered: plan creation/ingestion, story dispatch/checkpoint/interrupt, status transitions, review, merge, decisions, and config diagnostics. Minor gaps exist, such as no plan deletion/update tool, no detailed plan/story read-back tool beyond list_plans and list_ready_stories, and no merge rejection or PR close path, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues