MCP Graylog Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Graylog Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and analyze logs from Graylog instances using universal search with relative or absolute time windows, supporting both full result retrieval and lightweight count-only queries.31 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and analyze logs in Graylog using three powerful tools: generic log search with Lucene queries, smart UUID/trace ID lookup across multiple fields, and stream-specific message retrieval with automatic field normalization.22 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query and analyze Graylog logs through MCP tools for search, aggregation, stream listing, and saved queries, with optional OpenAI-powered natural language orchestration and audit logging.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying Graylog log management system for messages using natural language, supporting multiple instances and flexible search parameters.155 npm10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides a standardized MCP interface for querying Graylog logs, enabling AI agents to search, diagnose, and correlate runtime logs with code via configurable profiles.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI assistants direct access to your Graylog logs -- search, aggregate, analyze, and cluster log data through natural language.2313 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Some tools have overlapping functionality, such as search_logs and search_stream_logs, or aggregate_logs and get_log_count_by_level, which could cause confusion. However, most tools target distinct resources or actions.
Tools follow a snake_case pattern with verbs like get, list, search, aggregate. The pattern is mostly consistent but not perfectly uniform, e.g., list_streams vs get_stream_info.
9 tools is appropriate for a Graylog server, covering the main read operations without being excessive. It feels well-scoped.
The set covers common query and retrieval operations but lacks write or management tools (e.g., create stream, update). It seems focused on read-only access, which may be intentional but is incomplete for full lifecycle.