get-login-status
Check your login status on Zhihu. Returns 1 if logged in, 0 if not.
Instructions
获取登录状态,登陆完成返回1,没有登陆完成返回0
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Check your login status on Zhihu. Returns 1 if logged in, 0 if not.
获取登录状态,登陆完成返回1,没有登陆完成返回0
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description fully discloses the behavioral trait: it returns 1 or 0 depending on login status. This is adequate for a simple read-only tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys all necessary information without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (no parameters, no output schema), the description is fully complete: it states the action and the expected return values.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and the baseline for 0 parameters is 4. The description does not need to add parameter information.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (获取) and resource (登录状态), and specifies the return values (1 for logged in, 0 for not logged in). It is distinct from sibling tools like login-with-qrcode and logout.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for checking login status but provides no explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/morrain/zhihuMcpServer'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server