get_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description implies a read-only operation, but with no annotations, it does not disclose additional behavioral traits like authentication needs, rate limits, or side effects. Basic transparency is present, but gaps remain.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently conveys the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main aspects of the tool given no parameters and an output schema. However, it only lists examples ('including') rather than a comprehensive overview, leaving minor ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, so schema coverage is 100% vacuously. The description adds value by specifying what the output includes (active backend, output directory), which aids understanding beyond the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool shows current server configuration, mentioning specific elements like active backend and output directory. This distinguishes it from sibling tools that generate or manipulate media.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The purpose is clear, but no explicit guidance is given for when not to use or alternatives. Since siblings are all different functions, the usage context is implied, but formal guidelines are missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.