Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to codegraph

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Indexes any TypeScript / React / Next.js repo into a queryable code graph and exposes 13 MCP tools — who-renders, who-calls, find-references, blast-radius, find-cycles, dead-code orphans, and local semantic search — so agents query structure instead of reading whole files. Built on ts-morph, so edges are resolved, not grepped.
      14
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Indexes a mono-repo into a knowledge graph and provides MCP tools to query code structure—packages, components, routes, HTTP calls—without file reads or grep round-trips.
      7
      22 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables people and AI agents to query local code repositories as graphs through stdio MCP tools for project listing, search, dependency tracing, impact analysis, bridge detection, node inspection, bounded code reading, and optional LSP definition/reference lookups.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to query a local-first code intelligence graph of Python repositories—covering functions, classes, modules, and their relationships—via MCP, supporting subgraph retrieval, caller lookup, and impact analysis without re-reading the codebase.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An in-memory knowledge graph MCP server that gives coding agents structural and semantic recall over codebases by indexing Python source, ADR documents, and project configuration, exposing 7 tools for search, traversal, context retrieval, and natural-language Q&A.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a fairly distinct purpose: query_graph traces a single relationship while get_impact_radius computes transitive blast radius, and search_nodes vs get_node differ by fuzzy search vs exact lookup. The only mild overlap is get_review_context, which bundles callers and tests that also appear in get_impact_radius, but the added source snippets keep it differentiated.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (query_graph, get_impact_radius, find_dead_code, search_nodes, get_node). Two outliers carry a redundant '_tool' suffix (detect_changes_tool, index_repository_tool) and graph_status is noun-only, which are minor deviations rather than a broken convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well-scoped for a code-graph analysis server, covering setup, exploration, and analysis without redundancy. Every tool earns its place across the indexing/query/analysis lifecycle.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full workflow: indexing, status, symbol search/lookup, relationship tracing, impact analysis, diff risk, review context, architecture overview, and dead-code detection. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no explicit index deletion or cross-repo management), but core lifecycles are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues