atlas_user_get_all
Retrieve every Atlas user associated with a project for user management and access review.
Instructions
Get all Atlas users for the project
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| options | No | Optional parameters |
Retrieve every Atlas user associated with a project for user management and access review.
Get all Atlas users for the project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| options | No | Optional parameters |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as pagination, filtering, sorting, or performance implications. The optional 'options' parameter is unexplained.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, concise and front-loaded with key information, with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema, no annotations, and an undocumented nested options parameter, the description is insufficient for an AI agent to correctly invoke the tool without additional knowledge.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter, but the description only says 'Optional parameters', adding no meaning beyond the schema. The baseline is 3, but no additional value provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get all Atlas users for the project' clearly states the verb (Get), resource (all Atlas users), and scope (for the project), distinguishing it from siblings like atlas_user_get_by_id and atlas_user_get_by_name.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as atlas_user_get_by_id or user_get_all. The description lacks any when-to-use or when-not-to-use information.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/montumodi/mongodb-atlas-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server