Skip to main content
Glama
moneymanai

AgentPad

by moneymanai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentPad

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agentshield-mcp

      yeick010
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Trust infrastructure for AI agents on Base. DEX Spread Oracle (live Uniswap V3 prices), on-chain escrow, insurance pool, and collective knowledge base. 7 smart contracts. Pay-per-query via x402 micropayments in USDC.
      6
      -

    • awesome-base-mcp

      B5-Software
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an autonomous agent wallet on Base to make payments, approve tokens, swap on Uniswap V3, Aerodrome, 0x and CoW Protocol, lend/borrow via Aave V3 and Morpho Blue, trade perps on Hyperliquid, and enforce risk policies via blacklists, caps, simulation, and audit logs.
      1
      Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal

    • AI Work Market (AWM)

      darioandyoshi-tech
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Settlement rails for AI labor — USDC escrow on Base Mainnet, 1% protocol fee, designed for autonomous agents. 10 MCP tools covering the full escrow lifecycle: * Quoting calldata for create-intent, submit-proof, release-funds (broadcast gated) * Single-call x402 payment binding (replaces the 5-step x402 dance with one HMAC-signed POST) * Server-side reputation from on-chain event scan * Li
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most build_*_tx tools target distinct actions (launch, buy, sell, vote, claim, finalize, release, burn), but there are real duplicates: agentpad_buy and onboard_and_buy are explicitly 'the same' with a narrow difference, and token_transparency re-includes honest_volume's metrics (per-wallet flows, fee reconciliation, mismatch flags), so an agent could easily pick the wrong one. The quote vs build distinction is clear, and descriptions do mitigate some confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all transaction tools follow a clean build_<action>_tx pattern, and reads follow get_/list_/quote_/check_ prefixes in snake_case throughout. The deviations are the noun-only standalone names (agentpad_info, agentpad_buy, honest_volume, token_transparency, onboard_and_buy) which break the verb_noun convention but remain readable and predictable in style.

    Tool Count3/5

    24 tools is on the heavy side for a single protocol surface; the count is partly earned by the launch/team/vote/milestone lifecycle, but redundancy (two near-identical buy flows, analytics duplicated across honest_volume and token_transparency) means several tools do not fully earn their place. It sits in the borderline 16-25 band.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage is strong end-to-end: discovery (info, list_tokens, get_token, get_roadmap), pricing (quote_buy/quote_sell), identity and trading (register, launch, team launch, buy, sell, claim), governance (open votes, eligibility, vote, claim/finalize/release/burn milestones), plus analytics and transparency. I see no obvious missing operation for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources