list_tasks
Retrieve tasks from your task list, filtered by all, pending, or completed status.
Instructions
List all tasks or filter them by pending or completed status.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| status | No | all |
Retrieve tasks from your task list, filtered by all, pending, or completed status.
List all tasks or filter them by pending or completed status.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| status | No | all |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, description carries full burden. It only states basic listing/filtering behavior without disclosing ordering, pagination, or that results are always read-only. Lacks detail on behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Could be more informative while remaining concise, but structure is acceptable.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description should hint at return format (e.g., list of task objects with fields). It does not, leaving incomplete context for a list tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% (no parameter description in the description field). The 'status' parameter with enum values is not explained. Description adds no semantic value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'list all tasks' with optional filtering, distinguishing it from sibling tools (add, complete, delete, get, update). Action and resource are specific.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not specify context or exclusions for filtering or when to prefer get_task over list_tasks.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mohd-samir-shaikh/mini-task-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server