A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceProvides access to the CanLII API for searching and retrieving Canadian legal information, including court decisions, legislation, and citations.
24
MIT
canlii-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to canlii-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides access to CanLII's Canadian legal information, enabling search and retrieval of court decisions, legislation, and citations through natural language.25 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides access to Canadian federal parliamentary data (debates, bills, MPs, votes, Hansard transcripts) and legal information (case law and legislation through CanLII) for research and analysis.3MIT
caselegis-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching, retrieving, and checking citation status of California legal opinions via the Caselegis API.MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables retrieval of Canadian federal legislation (Acts and regulations) from the Justice Laws Website by code, providing metadata and full consolidated text in English and French.3Apache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to search the CanLII Canadian legal database and retrieve the full text of matching legal documents.1-
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 9 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a distinct purpose: browse_legislation lists legislation items, get_case_citator retrieves full citation relationships, get_case_citator_tease offers a quick preview, get_case_law_decisions lists decisions from a court database, get_case_metadata provides detailed case info, get_courts_and_tribunals lists available court databases, get_legislation_databases lists legislation databases, get_legislation_regulation_metadata fetches legislation details, and search performs keyword searches. No two tools overlap significantly.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a 'get_' prefix (e.g., get_case_metadata, get_courts_and_tribunals), but 'browse_legislation' uses 'browse_' and 'search' is a bare verb. This slight inconsistency is minor and does not hinder readability.
Tool Count5/5
Nine tools is appropriate for a legal research server. Each tool covers a core function—searching, browsing cases and legislation, citators, and metadata retrieval—without being excessive or insufficient.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers essential read-only legal research operations: search, browse, citator, and metadata. Minor gaps include lack of date filters on search (mitigated by jurisdiction keywords) and no direct full-text retrieval (URLs provided instead). Overall, it's well-rounded.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues