Skip to main content
Glama
mohamed-ashraf-elsaed

loupe-mcp

by mohamed-ashraf-elsaed
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to loupe-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • uigrep by SalzDevs

      uigrepofficial

      SalzDevs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to pull structured UI feedback captured in the browser — including element selectors, bounding boxes, computed styles, screenshots, and annotations — and to mark issues as fixed.
      MIT

    • Browser Feedback MCP

      itk-dev
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables visual browser feedback collection directly into Claude Code. Users can point at elements in their browser and send annotated feedback that Claude can act on immediately.
      12
      1
      -

    • claude-annotate

      gerald4277
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables visual annotation on web pages for Claude Code, allowing element selection, comment addition, screenshot capture, and structured UI feedback for code fixes via an MCP server.
      MIT

    • loopback

      joshidikshant
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Interactive feedback layer that lets users pin comments on live web apps with auto-captured context (failing requests, console, AI metadata), and coding agents fix issues via MCP, turning pins green upon verification.
      10
      64 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role in the comment-resolution workflow: listing comments, fetching one comment's context, proposing a UI change, and updating status. There is no meaningful overlap between them, so an agent can easily select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_comments, get_comment, propose_change, update_status. This makes the names predictable and easy to scan.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a focused workflow of reviewing feedback, gathering context, submitting a proposal, and closing the loop. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full agent-facing lifecycle: discover comments, inspect context, propose a change, and update status. Creation and review of PM comments happen outside this MCP server, so no critical gap remains.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources