agent_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries burden. It clearly indicates a read operation ('Get') and describes the output content, but does not explicitly state it is non-destructive or mention any auth requirements or rate limits. However, the nature of 'get' implies safety, and the description is thorough enough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first states purpose, second provides crucial usage instructions. No wasted words, front-loaded with purpose, and every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, output schema exists), the description is complete. It explains the purpose, the output content, and how to use the output in context (preparing a session), referencing sibling list tools for matching.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter 'agent_id' with 0% schema description coverage. The description adds context by specifying the ID pattern 'agent_*', which helps the agent understand the expected format beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves a single agent's full configuration by ID, using the specific verb 'Get' and resource 'agent configuration'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like agent_list (which lists all) and other get tools for different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance: read this before starting a session, use the retrieved configuration to determine required environment, vaults, and memory stores, then match against list tools. This tells when to use the tool and what to do with the output, implying when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.