Mockzilla
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Mockzilla
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for interacting with MockServer, enabling AI assistants to create mock HTTP expectations, verify requests, clear state, and manage MockServer instances programmatically.649 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA dead simple MCP server for exposing your app functions to AI agents like Claude Desktop.16 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that publishes CLI tools on your machine for discoverability by LLMs10 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server that wraps the headless Claude Code CLI as MCP tools, providing stateless access to Claude's coding capabilities through prompt-based interactions. It enables users to execute Claude Code commands with various prompt formats and structured outputs directly from MCP clients.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal MCP server that exposes fixed tools for GPT, Claude, and Gemini while routing to any OpenAI-compatible chat completions backend with independent configuration per target.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis tool creates a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that acts as a proxy for any API that has an OpenAPI v3.1 specification. This allows you to use Claude Desktop to easily interact with both local and remote server APIs.620 npm904MIT
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and the descriptions actively cross-reference each other to prevent misselection: deploy_mock_from_* explicitly warns it is NOT valid input for serve_locally, request_history vs diagnose_requests are differentiated as list-vs-diagnose, and wait_for_deploy vs wait_for_github_deploy are separated by deployment target. Even the three near-identical deploy_mock_from_catalog/spec/url tools are cleanly distinguished by input source. With 35 tools this is an exceptional level of disambiguation.
The overwhelming majority follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_replays, serve_locally, deploy_mock_from_catalog, wait_for_github_deploy, unpublish_from_github), and related families share structural prefixes (mockzilla_docs_*, deploy_mock_from_*, wait_for_*). Minor deviations include bare verbs (info, lint, simplify, pack) and a noun-first name (bridge_status), but these are isolated and the overall pattern remains highly predictable.
35 tools is on the heavy side and exceeds the calibration's 25-tool threshold for 'too many', but the domain is genuinely broad: local serving, hosted deployment, GitHub publishing, replay, spec processing, CLI management, and docs each demand their own surface. Some consolidation is possible (deploy_mock_from_spec and deploy_mock_from_url could be one tool; wait_for_deploy vs wait_for_github_deploy) but each tool does earn a place in the platform's scope.
The surface covers the full lifecycle remarkably well: create (serve_locally, mock_endpoint, deploy_*), read (list_sims, list_mock_endpoints, request_history, info), modify (setup_replay, simplify), and delete (stop_locally, clear_mock_endpoints, unpublish_from_github). Workflows are chained explicitly (deploy → wait_for_deploy → list_sims). The only notable gap is the absence of update/delete operations for hosted sims themselves — list_sims lists them but nothing can remove or modify an individual hosted sim.