Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Mockzilla

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for interacting with MockServer, enabling AI assistants to create mock HTTP expectations, verify requests, clear state, and manage MockServer instances programmatically.
      6
      46 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A dead simple MCP server for exposing your app functions to AI agents like Claude Desktop.
      8 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that publishes CLI tools on your machine for discoverability by LLMs
      2 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server that wraps the headless Claude Code CLI as MCP tools, providing stateless access to Claude's coding capabilities through prompt-based interactions. It enables users to execute Claude Code commands with various prompt formats and structured outputs directly from MCP clients.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients such as Claude, Cursor, VS Code, and Windsurf to manage workspaces, projects, tasks, and AI agents through natural language, using a hosted OAuth-authenticated endpoint or a local stdio package. It also ships an OpenAPI codegen tool for generating MCP tools from any OpenAPI spec.
      1,927 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and the descriptions actively cross-reference each other to prevent misselection: deploy_mock_from_* explicitly warns it is NOT valid input for serve_locally, request_history vs diagnose_requests are differentiated as list-vs-diagnose, and wait_for_deploy vs wait_for_github_deploy are separated by deployment target. Even the three near-identical deploy_mock_from_catalog/spec/url tools are cleanly distinguished by input source. With 35 tools this is an exceptional level of disambiguation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The overwhelming majority follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_replays, serve_locally, deploy_mock_from_catalog, wait_for_github_deploy, unpublish_from_github), and related families share structural prefixes (mockzilla_docs_*, deploy_mock_from_*, wait_for_*). Minor deviations include bare verbs (info, lint, simplify, pack) and a noun-first name (bridge_status), but these are isolated and the overall pattern remains highly predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    35 tools is on the heavy side and exceeds the calibration's 25-tool threshold for 'too many', but the domain is genuinely broad: local serving, hosted deployment, GitHub publishing, replay, spec processing, CLI management, and docs each demand their own surface. Some consolidation is possible (deploy_mock_from_spec and deploy_mock_from_url could be one tool; wait_for_deploy vs wait_for_github_deploy) but each tool does earn a place in the platform's scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle remarkably well: create (serve_locally, mock_endpoint, deploy_*), read (list_sims, list_mock_endpoints, request_history, info), modify (setup_replay, simplify), and delete (stop_locally, clear_mock_endpoints, unpublish_from_github). Workflows are chained explicitly (deploy → wait_for_deploy → list_sims). The only notable gap is the absence of update/delete operations for hosted sims themselves — list_sims lists them but nothing can remove or modify an individual hosted sim.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessLimited data