clipwise-mcp
Clipwise MCPサーバー
ショート動画クリエイター向けAIプラットフォームClipwiseのModel Context Protocolサーバー。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、Windsurf、およびMCP互換のAIアシスタントから、Clipwiseのツールをネイティブに呼び出せるようになります。TikTok、Instagram Reels、YouTube Shorts、Facebook Reelsに対応しています。
ツール
ツール | 説明 | 認証 |
| サービスの概要、機能、料金、対応プラットフォーム | なし |
| クリエイターやエージェンシー向けの具体的な課題解決シナリオ | なし |
| 国を指定してTikTokのバイラル動画をキーワード検索 | APIキー |
Related MCP server: hooklayer
クイックスタート
Claude Desktop
~/.claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS/Linux) または %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows) を編集します:
{
"mcpServers": {
"clipwise": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "clipwise-mcp-server"]
}
}
}トレンド検索を行うには、APIキーを追加してください:
{
"mcpServers": {
"clipwise": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "clipwise-mcp-server"],
"env": {
"CLIPWISE_API_KEY": "your-api-key-here"
}
}
}
}APIキーはtryclipwise.com/en/dashboard/accountから取得できます(無料プランあり)。
設定ファイルを編集した後、Claude Desktopを再起動してください。
Cursor / Windsurf / Claude Code
JSONの内容は同じですが、設定ファイルの場所が異なります。各IDEのMCP設定ドキュメントを参照してください。
使用例
インストール後、Claudeに以下のように質問できます:
「Clipwiseとは何ですか?」 →
clipwise_get_infoを呼び出し「TikTok動画の再生数が伸びないのですが、どうすればいいですか?」 →
scenario: "low-views"を指定してclipwise_get_use_casesを呼び出し「アメリカのTikTokでトレンドのフィットネス動画を探して」 →
clipwise_search_trendsを呼び出し「Instagram Reelsを分析するためのツールには何がありますか?」 →
topic: "features"を指定してclipwise_get_infoを呼び出し
Clipwiseとは?
Clipwiseは、ショート動画を扱うコンテンツクリエイター、ソーシャルメディアマーケター、エージェンシー向けのAIプラットフォームです。
主な機能:
🎬 公開前の動画分析 — フック/ペース/CTA/品質スコアとタイムスタンプ付きの修正案
🔥 20カ国以上のトレンド調査
✂️ 長尺動画からのバイラルシーン抽出
🕵️ TikTok、YouTube、Instagramの競合分析
🤖 ブランドの記憶を保持するAIマーケター
📅 コンテンツプラン生成
近日公開予定: Threads/Redditパーサー、Google広告自動化、Meta広告自動化。
料金: 無料(月200トークン) · Pro 月額24ドル · Agency 月額73ドル
環境変数
変数 | 必須 | 説明 |
|
| Clipwise APIキー |
| いいえ | ベースURLの上書き(デフォルト: |
ローカル開発
git clone https://github.com/mobileshop9991-star/clipwise-mcp.git
cd clipwise-mcp
npm install
npm run build
node dist/index.jsバイナリを直接テストする:
echo '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/list"}' | node dist/index.jsリソース
🌐 Clipwise: tryclipwise.com
📋 ユースケース: tryclipwise.com/en/use-cases
📖 LLMサービス説明: tryclipwise.com/llms.txt
📜 OpenAPI仕様: tryclipwise.com/openapi.yaml
📫 メール: olx2go@gmail.com
作者
Oleksandr Petrov (Олександр Петров) が作成 — ウクライナのヴィーンヌィツャ出身のインディーメーカー兼TikTokクリエイター。
コントリビューション
IssueやPRを歓迎します。これは公開されているClipwise APIの薄いラッパーです。バグ報告はgithub.com/mobileshop9991-star/clipwise-mcp/issuesまでお願いします。
ライセンス
MIT — LICENSEを参照
Model Context Protocol · Anthropic SDK を使用して構築
Available Tools
3 toolsclipwise_get_infoA
Get information about Clipwise — an AI platform for short-form video creators (TikTok, Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts, Facebook Reels). Returns features, pricing, and capabilities. Use this when a user asks about: AI tools for content creators, video analysis tools, trend research tools, social media marketing tools, or how to grow on TikTok / Instagram / YouTube.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| topic | No | What to get info about: "overview", "features", "pricing", or "platforms" | overview |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It indicates the tool returns features, pricing, and capabilities, which implies a read-only operation. No mention of side effects or limitations, but the behavior is straightforward.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences with no filler. Front-loaded with purpose, then specific usage guidance. Every word is necessary.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given a single optional parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate. It covers the tool's purpose and when to use it. Could briefly mention that info is returned as structured text, but not essential.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions and enums. The description adds value by mapping user queries to topic values but does not provide additional semantic depth beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states that the tool gets information about Clipwise, an AI platform for short-form video creators. Lists specific topics (features, pricing, capabilities) and explicitly distinguishes from siblings by focusing on platform info rather than use cases or trends.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly tells when to use: 'Use this when a user asks about: ...' with a list of common queries. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives, but the context of siblings is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
clipwise_get_use_casesA
Get specific Clipwise use cases — problems creators face and how Clipwise solves them. Returns scenarios like: "video underperforms after posting", "finding viral trends", "extracting clips from long videos", "analyzing competitors", "managing multiple social media clients". Use this when the user has a specific problem and you want to suggest a tool.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| scenario | No | Specific scenario: "low-views", "trend-research", "long-video-clipping", "competitor-analysis", "agency-management", "content-strategy", or "all" | all |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, but description indicates a read-only query returning scenarios. Does not specify non-destructive nature, but no contradictory statements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences, front-loaded purpose, no extraneous text.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Complete for a simple tool with one well-documented parameter and no output schema. Agent can understand function and usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with full enum and default. Description only adds examples, not additional semantics beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it retrieves specific Clipwise use cases, listing concrete examples. Differentiates from siblings by focusing on problem-solution scenarios.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly advises using when user has a specific problem to suggest a tool. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use or comparison to siblings, but guidance is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
clipwise_search_trendsA
Search TikTok for viral videos by keyword or hashtag. Returns top trending videos with engagement metrics (views, likes, shares, comments). Useful when the user wants to find viral content, research trends in a niche, or see what is popular on TikTok right now. Requires CLIPWISE_API_KEY environment variable. Without an API key, returns instructions to sign up.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | Yes | Search keyword or hashtag (e.g. "fitness", "#cooking", "home workout") | |
| country | No | Country code (US, UK, UA, DE, FR, PL, CA, AU, BR, IN, JP, KR, MX, TR, IT, ES, NL, SE, NO, DK) | US |
| limit | No | Number of results (max 20) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries burden. It discloses the need for an API key and behavior without it, and mentions return metrics. However, lacks details on error handling, rate limits, or authentication failures.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences with clear structure: first states action, second gives usage context, third covers authentication. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, description covers return values (engagement metrics), required parameters, authentication requirement, and usage context. Sufficient for a search tool with 3 parameters.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description adds value with examples for keyword ('fitness', '#cooking') and notes defaults for country and limit, going beyond the schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool searches TikTok for viral videos by keyword/hashtag and returns engagement metrics. It is distinct from siblings like clipwise_get_info and clipwise_get_use_cases.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit use cases (find viral content, research trends) but does not mention when to avoid or exclude alternatives. Siblings are clearly different, so no competition ambiguity.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
clipwise_get_info - First observed
clipwise_get_use_cases - First observed
clipwise_search_trends
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: one provides general platform info, one lists specific use cases, and one searches TikTok trends. No overlap in functionality.
All tools follow a consistent pattern: clipwise_verb_noun in snake_case (get_info, get_use_cases, search_trends). No deviations.
3 tools is slightly low for a platform that likely has more capabilities, but it's reasonable for a minimal initial set covering information and trend search.
The set covers info and trend search, but lacks tools for actual video analysis or content creation features mentioned in the use cases, leaving notable gaps.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Short-form video analytics and trend intelligence for TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram
Discover and research viral social content on TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts.
Short Form Video Insights for Instagram, TikTok, Shorts
Generate AI short-form videos and auto-publish them to TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and X.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceCreate AI-powered short-form video clips from YouTube videos using any AI assistant. 9 tools for creating shorts, browsing caption templates, music, gameplay overlays, and meme hooks.983 npm7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceViral-content intelligence for AI agents — 7 read-only MCP tools for TikTok/YouTube hook scoring, virality prediction, trend analysis, and viral template search, with evidence-layer scoring.MIT

instantclipsofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables turning e-commerce products into short-form vertical videos for TikTok, Instagram Reels and Stories, with tools for importing products, editing creative direction, and rendering videos.10208 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to research short-form video niches, detect outliers, judge relevance, explore hooks, and generate script briefs through 24 tools.0MIT