bobai_price

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the on-chain computation method and trust model (no off-chain API), but does not mention side effects, authorization needs, or performance characteristics. Adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-crafted sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently conveys purpose, outputs, and methodology.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and no output schema, the description fully explains what the tool returns (price in USD/BNB, market cap) and how it is computed (on-chain via PancakeSwap and Chainlink). Complete for a simple query tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and schema description coverage is 100% (trivially). Baseline is 4 as per instructions. The description adds value by explaining the output (price, market cap) and computation method, which is not covered by the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides live $BOBAI price in USD and BNB plus market cap, with a specific verb (Live price) and resource (BOBAI). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like bobai_activity or bobai_supply by focusing solely on price and market cap.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for obtaining price and market cap data, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide exclusions. However, given sibling tools cover other metrics, it is sufficiently clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.