vcluster_disconnect

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the return type (CommandResult or error) but does not explain the side effects of disconnecting, such as whether it modifies kubeconfig context, requires an active connection, or is reversible. With no annotations, the description fails to carry the behavioral transparency burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and to the point, with no redundant wording. The structure includes a short action statement and a return type section, which is efficient, though it sacrifices completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool that likely changes state (disconnecting), the description lacks essential context about prerequisites, effects, and alternatives. The output schema may document return values, but the description does not sufficiently inform an agent when and how to invoke this tool safely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter kubeconfig_path is not mentioned in the description. Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not clarify how or why this path is used, leaving the agent to infer semantics solely from the parameter name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Disconnect from a vcluster,' which identifies the specific action and resource. It is distinct from sibling tools like vcluster_delete or vcluster_pause, though it does not explicitly contrast itself with them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as vcluster_delete or vcluster_pause. No context is provided about prerequisites, scenarios, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.