Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to swag2mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Turns any OpenAPI specification into a fully working MCP server with a single command, enabling AI agents to call APIs without writing any glue code.
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with any REST API that has an OpenAPI specification by providing a lightweight MCP server that translates between natural language and API calls.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Automatically converts Swagger/OpenAPI specifications into MCP servers, enabling AI agents to interact with any REST API through natural language by exposing endpoints as AI-friendly tools.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Converts any OpenAPI specification into an MCP server, allowing AI assistants to interact with REST APIs through natural language.
      4 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Converts any OpenAPI 3.x spec into a live MCP server, making every endpoint a validated tool that AI agents can call without writing glue code.
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct entity (spec, collection, tag, endpoint) and scope (list, get, by_spec, by_tag, etc.) or a distinct action (search, inspect, invoke, info, response_*). The response_* tools are clearly differentiated: outline for structure, slice for extraction, filter for search/pagination, and compress for size reduction. Even the similar endpoint_by_id vs inspect are explicitly separated by 'quick summary' vs 'full technical details'.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a strong `resource_by_scope` pattern (e.g., endpoint_by_tag, collection_by_spec, tag_by_id) and consistent action verbs (search, invoke, info). The response_* prefix is uniform. Minor deviations: `spec_list` doesn't follow the `*_by_*` pattern, and `inspect` is an exception to the endpoint detail retrieval naming compared to `endpoint_by_id`.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 19 tools, this is slightly above the 'well-scoped' range (3–15) and in the 'heavy' band, but the count is justified by the domain: the spec-collection-tag-endpoint hierarchy yields 11 navigation tools, plus essential action tools (search, inspect, invoke, info) and 4 dedicated response-handling tools for large payloads. Each tool earns its place, though scope-combining could reduce redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The hierarchical navigation is complete: list and get for spec, collection, tag, and endpoint; search for discovery; inspect for full schemas; invoke for execution; and a full response post-processing pipeline (outline → slice/filter/compress). The only notable gap is the absence of a tool to export the raw OpenAPI specification document, but that is not essential for the stated purpose of discovering, inspecting, and invoking endpoints.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues