Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
mm-gtm

RBPaaS MCP Server

by mm-gtm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to RBPaaS MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • hr-assist

      paras2026-git
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to automate HR workflows such as employee onboarding by adding employees, sending emails, raising equipment tickets, and managing leave and meeting scheduling through MCP tools.
      12
      Apache 2.0

    • ServiceTitan MCP Server

      jrhoades1
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to query ServiceTitan data about technician jobs and business performance via natural language, while protecting customer personal information.
      -

    • Workday MCP Server

      pranjalkumar-evonence
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to Workday HCM data such as workers, organizations, locations, job profiles, and cost centers through MCP tools an LLM can call.
      -

    • CortexDSP MCP

      Santy1422
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to query Amazon DSP operations data such as scorecards, DNR investigations, DCR/POD metrics, and driver quality, with offline demo tools and secure access to real tenant data via an API key.
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., project KPIs vs member KPIs, optimization history vs optimization result). However, there are near-duplicates like get_overdue_feedbacks vs get_customer_feedbacks with an overdue_only filter, and get_project_list vs get_projects_with_deals, which could cause slight ambiguity. Overall, descriptions help disambiguate.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows the same 'get_' + noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_business_overview, get_project_kpis, get_resource_utilization). No mixed conventions or irregular verbs. The naming is predictable and consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 16 tools, the set is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but still reasonable for a comprehensive read-only reporting server covering projects, KPIs, feedback, scheduling, optimization, and deals. The count reflects the broad scope without being overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a wide range of read operations for its domain, including lists, details, KPIs, utilization, feedback, schedules, and deals. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no individual feedback detail, no agent detail), but the current surface is sufficient for most reporting and monitoring workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources