A
licenseC
qualityC
maintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to autonomously perform HR operations such as employee onboarding, leave management, meeting scheduling, ticket creation, and email notifications through MCP tool calling.
12
MIT
RBPaaS MCP Server
by mm-gtm
Related Servers
Alternatives to RBPaaS MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to query ServiceTitan data about technician jobs and business performance via natural language, while protecting customer personal information.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables read-only access to Workday HCM data such as workers, organizations, locations, job profiles, and cost centers through MCP tools an LLM can call.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceGives Claude live access to your Observe tenant, enabling natural language queries about errors, logs, and metrics without writing OPAL pipelines.5 npmMIT
- FlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to carry out HR workflows through MCP tools, including adding and retrieving employees, managing leave, sending emails, scheduling meetings, creating HR/IT tickets, and running end-to-end employee onboarding.7-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and managing a CRM database through natural language conversations with Claude Desktop.-
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 16 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., project KPIs vs member KPIs, optimization history vs optimization result). However, there are near-duplicates like get_overdue_feedbacks vs get_customer_feedbacks with an overdue_only filter, and get_project_list vs get_projects_with_deals, which could cause slight ambiguity. Overall, descriptions help disambiguate.
Naming Consistency5/5
Every tool follows the same 'get_' + noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_business_overview, get_project_kpis, get_resource_utilization). No mixed conventions or irregular verbs. The naming is predictable and consistent.
Tool Count4/5
At 16 tools, the set is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but still reasonable for a comprehensive read-only reporting server covering projects, KPIs, feedback, scheduling, optimization, and deals. The count reflects the broad scope without being overwhelming.
Completeness4/5
The server covers a wide range of read operations for its domain, including lists, details, KPIs, utilization, feedback, schedules, and deals. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no individual feedback detail, no agent detail), but the current surface is sufficient for most reporting and monitoring workflows.