Skip to main content
Glama
mlintangmz2765

Scholar MCP Server

by mlintangmz2765
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Scholar MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • classScopusMCP

      TaehongKim
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates Scopus, Crossref, and PubMed APIs to search academic papers and fetch abstracts, usable with any MCP-compatible AI client.
      2
      -

    • Academic Paper MCP HTTP/SSE

      pastchais
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.
      4
      MIT

    • research-mcp

      niol-zh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for academic literature research that integrates Scopus, CrossRef, OpenAlex, and Unpaywall to search documents, get abstracts, author profiles, citing papers, and open-access PDF links.
      9
      MIT

    • papers-mcp

      surendranb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for scientific grounding: search and discover open-access research papers across arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar, and retrieve references/citations from paywalled journals via public DOI/abstract metadata.
      3
      225 PyPI
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there are multiple tools for similar operations (e.g., author search from different sources, full-text extraction methods) which could cause confusion. Descriptions help differentiate, but an agent might struggle to choose the optimal tool without deep understanding.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names are descriptive but lack a consistent pattern. Verbs like 'search', 'get', 'fetch', 'retrieve', 'autocomplete' are used interchangeably, and some names include suffixes like '_s2', '_scopus', '_unpaywall' without a uniform convention. This can hinder predictability.

    Tool Count4/5

    27 tools is slightly above the typical range but justified by the broad domain coverage (author profiles, paper search, full text, citations, books). The tools are specialized but mostly warranted; however, some could be consolidated (e.g., multiple PDF extraction tools).

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a comprehensive set of academic research workflows: author disambiguation, paper search across multiple sources, metadata retrieval, full-text extraction, citation analysis, and book search/interaction. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of personal collection management or advanced analytics, but core needs are well-addressed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources