Skip to main content
Glama
mlexpertio

MCP PDF Reader

by mlexpertio
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP PDF Reader

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Custom PDF MCP Server

      Waicy
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server designed for processing PDF documents, enabling text extraction, table data retrieval, and metadata collection from local files. It allows users to scan directories for PDFs and read specific pages, specifically optimized for thesis literature analysis.
      3
      -

    • flint-slating

      ParkviewLab
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that reads PDFs and exposes them as structured Markdown, metadata, outlines, images, and tables to LLM consumers via tools like pdf_read_markdown and pdf_info.
      Apache 2.0

    • MCP PDF Reader

      rturv
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables the extraction of text, metadata, and embedded images from PDF files. It provides tools for searching text with context, reading specific pages, and counting total pages within a document.
      7
      16 npm
      1
      MIT

    • PDF Tools MCP Server

      lockon-n
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive tool server for reading, merging, and extracting content from PDF files via local paths or direct URLs. It enables metadata retrieval, regex searching, and page-specific text extraction with built-in caching and workspace-restricted security.
      9
      5,659 PyPI
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: one retrieves the list of documents, and the other retrieves the content of a specific document. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent 'get_document_<action>' pattern, using snake_case and the same prefix. The minor deviation is that one uses 'text' and the other 'list', but the pattern is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    For a PDF reader MCP server, two tools is minimal but still reasonable for core functionality: listing documents and reading their content. It feels slightly thin but earns its place.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers basic read operations (list and get content), but lacks tools for searching within documents, getting metadata, or navigating pages. Agents have no way to target specific sections or handle structured PDFs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources