warehouse_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. The description adds the useful behavioral note that this is a long-running operation, which the annotations do not convey. It does not explain what the response contains or whether it returns an operation handle, but the parenthetical provides meaningful additional context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single compact sentence that front-loads the operation, includes the workspace scope, and appends the relevant 'long-running operation' caveat. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, fully documented 3-parameter tool with no nested objects, the description is mostly sufficient. However, since there is no output schema, it leaves unclear what the tool returns after the long-running operation begins, such as an operation ID or status object.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and each parameter already has a basic explanation. The description adds no new parameter-level detail beyond clarifying that the warehouse lives in a workspace, which is already implied by workspaceId.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Create') and resource ('a new warehouse'), and scopes it to a workspace. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like warehouse_update, warehouse_delete, and workspace_create.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the use case: use this when you need to create a new warehouse in a workspace. However, it does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it, nor does it mention prerequisites such as the workspace already existing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.