fivem-server-doctor-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to fivem-server-doctor-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEvidence-first MCP server for diagnosing problems with hooks, plugins, skills and configuration, returning ranked probable causes and reviewable fixes without modifying the workspace.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables local FiveM development by letting an AI assistant execute JavaScript/Lua on the server or client, automate NUI interactions, capture game screenshots, manage resources, and run repeatable tests with screenshot evidence.4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides documentation lookup and search capabilities for FiveM development, including GTA V native functions, QBCore events, and ox_lib exports. Enables developers to query documentation and generate resource templates through natural language.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI coding agents with structured, evidence-based diagnostics about the local development environment, detecting tech stack, runtime mismatches, dependency state, services, ports, and Git status without exposing secrets or using network calls.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to debug errors by providing root cause analysis and ranked fixes with code patches. Supports any MCP client.2305 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLocal-only GitHub Actions and CI maintenance scanner for AI-built apps. Exposes scan, explanation, and fix-planning tools to MCP clients; modifies nothing and makes no outbound requests by default.351 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a distinct responsibility: scanning the whole server, inspecting a specific resource, proposing fixes, and applying a single fix. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their purposes.
Tool names use a two-word underscore pattern, but the verb/noun order is inconsistent: doctor_scan and resource_inspect are object-first, while propose_fixes and apply_fix are verb-first. This mix is still readable but not perfectly predictable.
Four tools form a tight, well-scoped workflow for diagnosing and fixing FiveM servers. Each tool adds a necessary stage in the process, and there is no bloat.
The scan → inspect → propose → apply lifecycle is complete for the core server-doctor functionality. A minor gap is the lack of a revert or validation step after applying a fix, but it can be worked around.