mcp-seo-audit
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-seo-audit
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform comprehensive SEO audits on web pages, including meta tags, headings, links, images, performance, and more, via a CLI or MCP server.181MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSEO toolkit MCP server for analyzing meta tags, robots.txt, sitemaps, keyword density, readability, and heading structure from any AI assistant that supports MCP.612 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceMCP server for website SEO + GEO analysis. Scan any URL to get scores across 5 categories (SEO, GEO, Performance, Security, Accessibility) with actionable fix recommendations. Enables AI coding assistants to audit websites and implement fixes autonomously.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides comprehensive technical SEO audits, Schema.org validation, AEO readiness checks, and semantic cannibalization detection via MCP and CLI.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables SEO audits and URL monitoring via the SEO Radar API from any MCP-compatible AI client.75 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceExposes the OctoBoost SEO API as MCP tools so agents can audit websites with compact, structured results instead of fetching and parsing raw HTML.429 npm-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of SEO auditing: page content, schema, robots.txt, sitemaps, and links. There is no overlap in their purposes, making selection unambiguous.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: audit_page, extract_schema, check_robots, parse_sitemap, extract_links. The naming is predictable and follows a clear convention.
Five tools is well-scoped for an SEO audit server. Each tool covers a core aspect of SEO analysis without redundancy, and the count feels neither sparse nor bloated.
The tool set covers the essential components of a technical SEO audit: on-page elements, structured data, robots directives, sitemap discovery, and link analysis. There are no obvious gaps for a standard audit workflow.