Skip to main content
Glama
mjyoo2
by mjyoo2

Related Servers

Alternatives to HWP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control Hancom's HWP/HWPX documents (Korean word processor) via COM interface on Windows, supporting creation, editing, formatting, and export.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and edit Korean HWP/HWPX documents, including converting Hanyang PUA old-Hangul characters to Unicode jamo, diagnosing unsupported characters, and preserving arae-a, panch'im, yet-ieung, expanded jamo, filler and side dots. Also supports HWPX search-and-replace, template filling, paragraph/table/image/style editing, page rendering to SVG/HTML, and creating new HWPX documents.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables creating, editing, and reading Korean Hangul word-processor documents (.hwpx and .hwp) locally through Claude Desktop or VS Code, with no network or separate machine required. Provides tools for text, formatting, tables, images, charts, equations, footnotes, hyperlinks, and fields, and can export to PDF or convert .hwp files to .hwpx when Hangul is installed on Windows.
      22
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables reading, editing, and creating Korean HWPX documents through python-hwpx library. Supports document creation, paragraph/table/image insertion, metadata management, and workspace-restricted file operations with automatic backup functionality.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to read, create, and edit Korean HWPX documents with advanced support for tables, paragraphs, styles, and images. It features enhanced stability through atomic file writing and smart layout recalculation to prevent document corruption.
      34
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 140 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    There are several near-duplicate tools that an agent would struggle to distinguish, such as get_cursor_position vs get_pos_by_set, set_cursor_position vs set_pos_by_set, and run_script/run_macro/run_hwp_action. The six hwp_*_param_action tools plus hwp_misc_param_action overlap heavily with each other and with dedicated tools like set_page_style and set_header_footer.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tools follow a clear snake_case verb_noun convention (open_document, save_document, create_table, get_field_text), which makes the set largely predictable. A few legacy/internal-style names such as hwp_enum, get_pos_by_set, is_action_enable, and set_char_shape deviate, but they are the exception rather than the rule.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 140 tools, this server is an extreme count mismatch; even the calibration's lowest category starts at 50+. The set is bloated by multiple generic param-action catch-alls and raw COM helper tools that could be consolidated into far fewer coherent operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers an impressively broad domain: document lifecycle, text, tables, fields, styles, forms, page layout, images, conversion, printing, and security. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit create_new_document, no dedicated delete_table/delete_paragraph tool, and an over-reliance on raw escape-hatch actions for many operations, but agents can usually work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues