HWP MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to HWP MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to control Hancom's HWP/HWPX documents (Korean word processor) via COM interface on Windows, supporting creation, editing, formatting, and export.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables reading, editing, and creating Korean HWPX documents through python-hwpx library. Supports document creation, paragraph/table/image insertion, metadata management, and workspace-restricted file operations with automatic backup functionality.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAutomates Hancom Office HWP forms via COM, converting, extracting, field-filling, and exporting to PDF, preserving original formatting for Korean government and school documents.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI models to read, create, and edit Korean HWPX documents with advanced support for tables, paragraphs, styles, and images. It features enhanced stability through atomic file writing and smart layout recalculation to prevent document corruption.33MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive control of Korean Hangul (HWP) documents with 59 features including document manipulation, text editing, formatting, table operations, PDF export, and advanced automation capabilities like template filling and document structure analysis.6-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, search, and modify HWPX documents directly via MCP, without requiring Hancom Word Processor. Supports pure Python, cross-platform operation.1,244 PyPI68Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 140 tools
There are several near-duplicate tools that an agent would struggle to distinguish, such as get_cursor_position vs get_pos_by_set, set_cursor_position vs set_pos_by_set, and run_script/run_macro/run_hwp_action. The six hwp_*_param_action tools plus hwp_misc_param_action overlap heavily with each other and with dedicated tools like set_page_style and set_header_footer.
The majority of tools follow a clear snake_case verb_noun convention (open_document, save_document, create_table, get_field_text), which makes the set largely predictable. A few legacy/internal-style names such as hwp_enum, get_pos_by_set, is_action_enable, and set_char_shape deviate, but they are the exception rather than the rule.
With 140 tools, this server is an extreme count mismatch; even the calibration's lowest category starts at 50+. The set is bloated by multiple generic param-action catch-alls and raw COM helper tools that could be consolidated into far fewer coherent operations.
The tool surface covers an impressively broad domain: document lifecycle, text, tables, fields, styles, forms, page layout, images, conversion, printing, and security. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit create_new_document, no dedicated delete_table/delete_paragraph tool, and an over-reliance on raw escape-hatch actions for many operations, but agents can usually work around these.