Remove items from a list
remove_itemsRemove items from a list. Returns true on success.
Instructions
Remove items from a list. Returns true on success.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes | ||
| item_ids | Yes |
remove_itemsRemove items from a list. Returns true on success.
Remove items from a list. Returns true on success.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes | ||
| item_ids | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v2.2.0Input schema / properties / item_ids / items / patternAdded value: +"^[A-Za-z0-9_-]+$"Input schema / properties / list_id / patternAdded value: +"^[A-Za-z0-9_-]+$"v2.0.1Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry behavioral disclosure. It only states the return value (true on success) but omits critical details such as required permissions, whether removal is reversible, and whether missing item_ids are ignored or cause errors.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short, front-loaded sentences with minimal waste. The purpose is stated first, followed by the return value, which is efficient though slightly sparse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not cover permissions, error conditions, or parameter semantics for a mutation tool with two required parameters.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not describe the two parameters (list_id, item_ids) beyond their names. With a low coverage, the description fails to compensate for the missing parameter documentation, leaving the agent to infer meanings from names alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb (Remove) and resource (items from a list), which distinguishes it from siblings like add_item and update_item. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from other removal-style siblings such as delete_list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No indication of when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_item or delete_list, nor any prerequisites or conditions for use. The description offers no guidance on selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.