nightglass MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to nightglass MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables capturing screenshots of URLs, extracting page content as Markdown, and managing ScreenshotAPI account usage from MCP-compatible AI agents.5-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn official MCP server implementation that allows AI assistants to capture website screenshots through the ScreenshotOne API, enabling visual context from web pages during conversations.115 npm36MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables capturing screenshots of web pages and local HTML files through a simple MCP tool interface using Puppeteer with configurable options for dimensions and output paths.272 npm31Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables capturing website screenshots with full-page, element-specific, and device-responsive capabilities through natural language commands.316 npm61MIT

zenrows-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceScrape any webpage and return clean markdown, HTML, or structured JSON. Bypasses anti-bot protection, renders JavaScript (React/Vue/Angular), supports premium residential proxies and CSS extraction. Works with any MCP client — no local install required.1407 npm19MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to visually inspect and interact with rendered web pages via a persistent headless Chromium browser, supporting navigation, screenshots, clicks, viewport resizing, and console log retrieval.81MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: take_screenshot handles capturing website screenshots, while check_balance manages account credits. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tools follow the consistent verb_noun pattern: take_screenshot and check_balance. The naming is clear, predictable, and matches the action they perform.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a screenshot service. A typical screenshot API might include additional tools for managing captures, listing history, or configuring settings, but the current count is borderline acceptable.
The server covers the core screenshot-taking workflow and account balance check. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no history, download, or retry options), but the primary use case is fully addressed.