Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SSH MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) SSH client server that provides autonomous SSH operations for GitHub Copilot and VS Code. Enable natural language SSH automation without manual prompts or GUI interactions.
      20
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      SSH automation MCP server that enables Claude and ChatGPT to execute commands, manage files, install packages, and control services on remote servers over SSH — supporting password, key, and agent authentication.
      33
      1,267 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure SSH connections to multiple remote servers with support for command execution, file transfers (SFTP), directory listing, and both password and key-based authentication.
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables SSH operations including connecting to remote servers, executing commands, and transferring files between local and remote systems. Supports multiple SSH connections with both password and private key authentication methods.
      18
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The SSH tools (ssh_connect, ssh_disconnect, ssh_exec, ssh_list_files, ssh_upload_file, ssh_download_file) are clearly distinct and cover basic SSH operations well. However, the Ubuntu-specific tools (ubuntu_nginx_control, ubuntu_ssl_certificate, ubuntu_ufw_firewall, ubuntu_update_packages, ubuntu_website_deployment) overlap conceptually with the SSH tools since they also involve remote server management, creating some ambiguity about when to use which set. The descriptions help differentiate, but the boundary between general SSH operations and Ubuntu-specific administration is not perfectly clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming is mostly consistent with a verb_noun pattern (e.g., ssh_connect, ssh_exec, ubuntu_update_packages), which is predictable and readable. However, there is a minor deviation: 'ssh_download_file' and 'ssh_upload_file' use 'download' and 'upload' as verbs, while others like 'ssh_list_files' use 'list'—this is still consistent in style but slightly varies in verb choice. Overall, the naming follows a clear convention with only small inconsistencies.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 11 tools, the count is reasonable for a server focused on SSH and Ubuntu server management. It covers a broad scope without being excessive. However, the split between general SSH tools (6 tools) and Ubuntu-specific tools (5 tools) might feel slightly fragmented, making it borderline heavy for a pure SSH server but still well-scoped for the combined purpose. It earns its place but could be optimized for clarity.

    Completeness4/5

    For SSH operations, the toolset is quite complete, covering connection management, file transfer, command execution, and directory listing—no major gaps. For Ubuntu server management, it includes key areas like web server control, SSL, firewall, updates, and deployment, which is comprehensive. A minor gap is the lack of tools for non-Ubuntu systems or more advanced SSH features (e.g., port forwarding), but agents can work around this with the existing tools for core workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive