Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to osiris-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing a university course catalog with tools for searching courses, looking up prerequisites and instructors, and generating prerequisite graphs, plus resources and a prompt template for AI academic advisors.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for the University of Vienna's course catalogue (u:find), enabling natural language queries for courses, programmes, staff, and schedules. Read-only, no account or API key required.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables TU Delft students to access their Brightspace courses, OSIRIS records, MyTimetable schedule, and the Study Guide through any MCP client. It handles sign-in and requires confirmation before performing write actions.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct: list/get operations separate by resource (years, categories, faculties, course_types, courses). The main ambiguity is between get_course (header), get_course_details (full details), and get_course_details_by_id (full details by internal id) — get_course_details and get_course_details_by_id return the same data but keyed differently, and get_course's 'header' vs details boundary could cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set follows a consistent get_/list_ verb prefix pattern (get_available_years, get_categories, list_courses, get_course, search_courses). Minor deviations exist: search_courses uses a different verb while other exploration tools use get_/list_, and get_course_details_by_id introduces the '_by_id' suffix that isn't used elsewhere.

    Tool Count4/5

    Ten tools is within the ideal range for a catalog/query server. Each tool earns a place: three discovery tools (years, categories, faculties/course_types), course listing/search, and course retrieval at different granularities.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is strong for a read-only catalog: discovery (faculties, years, course types, categories), search, listing, and multi-level retrieval (header vs full details). The main gap is that get_course_details_by_id is redundant with get_course_by_code — agents could hit dead ends if they don't know which lookup path to use; a by-code variant of full details is also missing from the direct route.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues